<div>Indicator minerals are those minerals that indicate the presence of a specific mineral deposit, alteration or lithology[1]. Their utility to the exploration industry has been demonstrated in a range of environments and across multiple deposit types including Cu-Au porphyry[2], Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag VMS[3] and Ni-Cu-PGE[4]. Recent developments in the field of SEM-EDS analysis have enabled the rapid quantitative identification of indicator minerals during regional sampling campaigns[4,5].</div><div>Despite the demonstrated utility of indicator minerals for diamond and base metal exploration in Canada, Russia and Africa, there are relatively few case studies published from Australian deposits. We present the results of an indicator mineral case study over the Julimar exploration project located 90 km NE of Perth. The Gonneville Ni-Cu-PGE deposit, discovered by Chalice Mining in 2020, is hosted within a ~30 km long belt of 2670 Ma ultramafic intrusions within the western margin of the Yilgarn Craton[6].</div><div>Stream sediments collected from drainage channels around the Gonneville deposit were analysed by quantitative mineralogy techniques to determine if a unique indicator mineral footprint exists there. Samples were processed and analysed for heavy minerals using a workflow developed for the Curtin University-Geoscience Australia Heavy Mineral Map of Australia project[7]. Results indicate elevated abundances of indicator minerals associated with ultramafic/mafic magmatism and Ni-sulfide mineralisation in the drainages within the Julimar project area, including pyrrhotite, pentlandite, pyrite and chromite. We conclude that indicator mineral studies using automated mineralogy are powerful, yet currently underutilised, tools for mineral exploration in Australian environments.</div><div>[1]McClenaghan, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/03-066 </div><div>[2]Hashmi et al., 2015. https://doi.org/10.1144/geochem2014-310 </div><div>[3]Lougheed et al., 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10040310 </div><div>[4]McClenaghan &amp; Cabri, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/10-IM-026 </div><div>[5]Porter et al., 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2020.103406 </div><div>[6]Lu et al., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35768.47367 </div><div>[7]Caritat et al., 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12080961 </div> This Abstract was submitted/presented to the 2023 Australian Exploration Geoscience Conference 13-18 Mar (https://2023.aegc.com.au/)

<div>Although heavy mineral exploration techniques have been successfully used as exploration vectors to ore deposits around the world, exploration case studies and pre-competitive datasets relevant to Australian conditions are relatively limited. The Heavy Mineral Map of Australia (HMMA) project is a novel analytical campaign to determine the abundance and distribution of heavy minerals (SG>2.9 g/cc) in 1315 floodplain sediment samples collected from catchments across Australia during Geoscience Australia’s National Geochemical Survey of Australia (NGSA) project. Archived NGSA samples, which originated from, on average, 60 to 80 cm depth in floodplain landforms, were sub-sampled and subjected to dense media separation and automated SEM-EDS analysis in the John de Laeter Centre at Curtin University. Mineral assay data from all 1315 drainage samples will be publicly released by the end of 2023. </div><div><br></div><div>An initial data package released in August 2022 contains mineralogical assay data for 223 samples from the Darling–Curnamona–Delamerian (DCD) region of south-eastern Australia. That package identified over 140 heavy minerals from 29 million individual mineral observations. The number of mineral observations generated during the project required development of a novel Mineral Network Analysis (MNA) tool to allow end users to discover, visualise and interpret mineral co-occurrence relationships, potentially useful in exploration vectoring and targeting. The MNA tool can also be used to rapidly search the heavy mineral database to locate observations of potential economic significance. The co-occurrence of Zn-minerals indicative of high-grade metamorphism of base metal mineralisation (e.g., gahnite (Zn-spinel), ecandrewsite (Zn-ilmenite) and zincostaurolite (Zn-aluminosilicate)) from the region surrounding Broken Hill demonstrated the utility of the method. Zn-mineral co-occurrences not associated with known mineralisation were also noted and may represent targeting opportunities. </div><div><br></div><div>Heavy mineral data from parts of Queensland are scheduled for a separate public release in December 2022 and will be presented at the conference.&nbsp;</div> This Abstract was submitted/presented to the 2023 Australian Exploration Geoscience Conference 13-18 Mar (https://2023.aegc.com.au/)

The National Geochemical Survey of Australia (<a href="http://www.ga.gov.au/ngsa" title="NGSA website" target="_blank">NGSA</a>) is Australia’s only internally consistent, continental-scale <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11636/Record.2011.020" title="NGSA geochemical atlas and dataset" target="_blank">geochemical atlas and dataset</a>. The present dataset contains additional mineralogical data obtained on NGSA samples selected from the Darling-Curnamona-Delamerian (<a href="https://www.ga.gov.au/eftf/projects/darling-curnamona-delamerian" title="DCD website" target="_blank">DCD</a>) region of southeastern Australia for the first partial data release of the Heavy Mineral Map of Australia (HMMA) project. The HMMA, a collaborative project between Geoscience Australia and Curtin University underpinned by a pilot project establishing its feasibility, is part of the Australian Government-funded Exploring for the Future (<a href="https://www.ga.gov.au/eftf" title="EFTF website" target="_blank">EFTF</a>) program. The selected 223 NGSA sediment samples fall within the DCD polygon plus an approximately one-degree buffer. The samples were taken on average from 60 to 80 cm depth in floodplain landforms, dried and sieved to a 75-430 µm grainsize fraction, and the contained heavy minerals (HMs; i.e., those with a specific gravity >2.9 g/cm³) were separated by dense fluids and mounted on cylindrical epoxy mounts. After polishing and carbon-coating, the mounts were subjected to automated mineralogical analysis on a TESCAN® Integrated Mineral Analyzer (TIMA). Using scanning electron microscopy and backscatter electron imaging integrated with energy dispersive X-ray analysis, the TIMA identified over 140 different HMs in the DCD area. The dataset, consisting of over 29 million individual mineral grains identified, was quality controlled and validated by an expert team. The data released here can be visualised, explored and downloaded using an online, bespoke mineral network analysis tool (<a href="https://geoscienceaustralia.shinyapps.io/mna4hm/" title="MNA website" target="_blank">MNA</a>) built on a cloud-based platform. Accompanying this report are a data file of TIMA results and a mineralogy vocabulary file. When completed in 2023, it is hoped the HMMA project will positively impact mineral exploration and prospectivity modelling around Australia, as well as have other applications in earth and environmental sciences.

<div>The push of mineral exploration under cover requires developing new geochemical exploration approaches. Detailed hydrogeochemistry addresses these needs and is valuable as a non-invasive mineral exploration technique that can identify lithological changes and dispersion signatures associated with mineralisation. Here we integrate whole-rock geochemistry and hydrogeochemistry to evaluate suitable geochemical tracers in groundwater for detecting phosphate and/or Pb-Zn style mineralisation in the Georgina Basin. The known Georgina Basin’s phosphate deposits are within the basin’s aquifers, providing groundwater near deposits greater exposure and opportunity for water-rock interactions with mineralised geology, resulting in trace element and isotope signatures of mineralisation at detectable levels. These tracers can then be applied elsewhere in the basin as a screening tool for detecting mineralisation. To achieve this, we collected rock geochemistry from the MinEx CRC East Tennant National Drilling Initiative Campaign (ME-ET) drillcore, and integrated it with nearby hydrogeochemistry (from the Northern Australia Hydrogeochemical Survey (NAHS)). </div><div><br></div><div>The NAHS was collected by Geoscience Australia as part of EFTF, which included 170 samples from Georgina Basin aquifers. This hydrogeochemistry dataset is high quality, due to robust sampling, QA/QC procedures and a comprehensive analysis suite, making it a useful tool for mineral exploration in the Georgina Basin. The ME-ET drilled 10 stratigraphic holes east of Tennant Creek, Northern Territory, in support of Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future program (EFTF). Seventy six Georgina Basin rock samples were collected for whole rock geochemistry and a subset for Pb and Sr isotopes. Samples were selected to target: 1) background unmineralised lithostratigraphy, 2) intervals with groundwater intersections, and 3) transects through zones with anomalous concentrations of P, Pb, Zn and Cu, as identified by portable XRF analysis. </div><div><br></div><div>Initial exploratory data analysis of the hydrogeochemistry is conducted at various scales using principle component analysis and clustering approaches to identify the key attributes (major and trace elements, isotopes, hydrogeology etc.) that are associated with higher P content in the groundwater. These relationships are tested by comparing groundwater samples proximal (in depth and spatially) to high P compositions in the host rock, providing insight into the water-rock interactions taking place. Additionally, vertical whole rock geochemistry transects within the drill-holes are investigated to evaluate the trace element and/or isotopic features that are diagnostic of the enriched phosphate zones. We take the robust geochemical relationships identified from both approaches and apply them as tracers across the NAHS to flag areas of potential undiscovered mineralisation. As we will demonstrate, the NAHS can detect subtle or diluted mineralisation signatures, and underpins a revised understanding of phosphate mineral prospectivity in the Georgina Basin.</div> Abstract submitted and presented at 2023 Australian Earth Science Convention (AESC), Perth WA (https://2023.aegc.com.au/)

<div>Heavy minerals (HMs) are those with a specific gravity greater than 2.9 g/cc (e.g., anatase, zircon). They have been used successfully in mineral exploration programs outside Australia for decades [1 and refs therein]. Individual HMs and combinations, or co-occurrence, of HMs can be characteristic of lithology, degree of metamorphism, alteration, weathering or even mineralisation. These are termed indicator minerals, and have been used in exploration for gold, diamonds, mineral sands, nickel-copper, platinum group elements, volcanogenic massive sulfides, non-sulfide zinc, porphyry copper-molybdenum, uranium, tin-tungsten, and rare earth elements mineralization. Although there are proprietary HM sample assets held by industry in Australia, no extensive public-domain dataset of the natural distribution of HMs across the continent currently exists.</div><div> We describe a vision for a national-scale heavy mineral (HM) map generated through automated mineralogical identification and quantification of HMs contained in floodplain sediments from large catchments covering most of Australia [1]. These samples were collected as part of the National Geochemical Survey of Australia (NGSA; www.ga.gov.au/ngsa) and are archived in Geoscience Australia’s rock store. The composition of the sediments can be assumed to reflect the dominant rock and soil types within each catchment (and potentially those upstream), with the generally resistant HMs largely preserving the mineralogical fingerprint of their host protoliths through the weathering-transport-deposition cycle. </div><div> Underpinning this vision is a pilot project, focusing on a subset of NGSA to demonstrate the feasibility of the larger, national-scale project. Ten NGSA sediment samples were selected and both bulk and HM fractions were analysed for quantitative mineralogy using a Tescan® Integrated Mineral Analyzer (TIMA) at the John de Laeter Centre, Curtin University (Figure 1). Given the large and complex nature of the resultant HM dataset, we built a bespoke, cloud-based mineral network analysis (MNA) tool to visualise, explore and discover relationships between HMs, as well as between them and geological setting or mineral deposits. The pilot project affirmed our expectations that a rich and diverse mineralogical ecosystem will be revealed by expanding HM mapping to the continental scale. </div><div> A first partial data release in 2022 was the first milestone of the Heavy Mineral Map of Australia (HMMA) project. The area concerned is the Darling-Curnamona-Delamerian region of southeastern Australia, where the richly endowed Broken Hill mineral province lies. Here, we identified over 140 heavy minerals from 29 million individual mineral observations in 223 sediment samples. Using the MNA tool, one can quickly identify interesting base metal mineral associations and their spatial distributions (Figure 2).</div><div> We envisage that the Heavy Mineral Map of Australia and the MNA tool will contribute significantly to mineral prospectivity analysis and modelling in Australia, particularly for technology critical elements and their host minerals, which are central to the global economy transitioning to a more sustainable, decarbonised paradigm.</div><div><br></div>Figure 1. Distribution map of ten selected heavy minerals in the heavy mineral fractions of the ten NGSA pilot samples (pie charts), overlain on Australia’s geological regions (variable colors) [2]). Map projection: Albers equal area.</div><div><br></div><div>Figure 2. Graphical user interface for the Geoscience Australia MNA cloud-based visualization tool for the DCD project (https://geoscienceaustralia.shinyapps.io/HMMA-MNA/) showing the network for Zn minerals with the gahnite subnetwork highlighted (left) and the map of gahnite distribution (right).</div><div> <strong>References</strong></div><div>[1] Caritat et al., 2022, Minerals, 12(8), 961. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12080961 </div><div>[2] Blake &amp; Kilgour, 1998, Geosci Aust. https://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/32366 </div><div><br></div>This Abstract was submitted/presented to the 2022 Mineral Prospectivity and Exploration Targeting (MinProXT 2022) webinar, Freiburg, Germany, 01 - 03 November (www.minproxt.com)

<div>Scientific studies undertaken on core from the Barnicarndy 1 well drilled in 2019 in the onshore Canning Basin in Western Australia as part of the Exploring for the Future program have shown that the well penetrated a thick section of the early Ordovician Nambeet Formation which contains abundant fossils reflective of deposition in an open marine environment. Although the calcareous shales are organically poor (average total organic carbon content 0.17 wt%) processing of 42 drill core samples recovered a plethora of acid-resistant, organic-walled microfossils. Seven core samples with the highest organic content were analysed for their molecular (biomarker) fossils and stable isotopic composition to provide insights into the type of organic matter preserved, and the redox conditions of the sediments during deposition.</div><div><br></div>This Abstract was submitted/presented to the 2022 Australian Organic Geochemistry Conference 27-29 November (https://events.csiro.au/Events/2022/October/5/Australian-Organic-Geochemistry-Conference)

NDI Carrara 1 is a deep stratigraphic drill hole completed in 2020 as part of the MinEx CRC National Drilling Initiative (NDI) in collaboration with Geoscience Australia and the Northern Territory Geological Survey. It is the first test of the Carrara Sub-Basin, a depocentre newly discovered in the South Nicholson region based on interpretation from seismic surveys (L210 in 2017 and L212 in 2019) recently acquired as part of the Exploring for the Future program. The drill hole intersected approximately 1120 m of Proterozoic sedimentary rocks unconformably overlain by 630 m of Cambrian Georgina Basin carbonates. Continuous cores recovered from 283 m to a total depth of 1750 m provide samples of the highest quality for a comprehensive geochemical program designed to inform on the energy and mineral prospectivity of the Carrara Sub-basin. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) contents from Rock-Eval pyrolysis of the Cambrian and Proterozoic sections demonstrate the potential for several thick black shales as source rocks and unconventional plays. Evidence for retained hydrocarbons included bituminous oil stains in centimetre-scale vugs within the Cambrian Georgina Basin and several oil bleeds within the Proterozoic section. The latter also contains surface gas with up to 2% methane concentrations measured within carbonaceous mudstones. Geochemical analyses of hydrocarbon shows highlight the occurrence of several petroleum systems operating in this frontier region. The results at NDI Carrara 1 offer the promise of a new exciting resource province in northern Australia.

The Roebuck Basin on Australia’s offshore north-western margin is the focus of a regional hydrocarbon prospectivity assessment being undertaken by the Offshore Energy Systems Section. This offshore program is designed to produce pre-competitive information to assist with the evaluation of the hydrocarbon resource potential of the central North West Shelf and attract exploration investment to Australia. The recent oil and gas discoveries at Phoenix South 1 (2014), Roc 1 (2015-16), Roc 2 (2016), Phoenix South 2 (2016), Phoenix South 3 (2018), Dorado 1 (2018) and Dorado 2–3 (2019) in the Bedout Sub-basin demonstrate the presence of a petroleum system in Lower Triassic strata (Grosjean et al., 2021; Rollet et al., 2019). As part of this program, a range of organic geochemical analyses were acquired on petroleum fluids from the Dorado 1 and Roc 2 wells with these data released in this report.

The unexpected discovery of oil in Triassic sedimentary rocks of the Phoenix South 1 well on Australia’s North West Shelf (NWS) has catalysed exploration interest in pre-Jurassic plays in the region. Subsequent neighbouring wells Roc 1–2, Phoenix South 2–3 and Dorado 1–3 drilled between 2015 and 2019 penetrated gas and/or oil columns, with the Dorado field containing one of the largest oil resources found in Australia in three decades. This study aims to understand the source of the oils and gases of the greater Phoenix area, Bedout Sub-basin using a multiparameter geochemical approach. Isotopic analyses combined with biomarker data confirm that these fluids represent a new Triassic petroleum system on the NWS unrelated to the Lower Triassic Hovea Member petroleum system of the Perth Basin. The Bedout Sub-basin fluids were generated from source rocks deposited in paralic environments with mixed type II/III kerogen, with lagoonal organofacies exhibiting excellent liquids potential. The Roc 1–2 gases and the Phoenix South 1 oil are likely sourced proximally by Lower–Middle Triassic TR10–TR15 sequences. Loss of gas within the Phoenix South 1 fluid due to potential trap breach has resulted in the formation of in-place oil. These discoveries are testament to new hydrocarbon plays within the Lower–Middle Triassic succession on the NWS.

The Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic McArthur Basin and Mount Isa region of northern Australia (Figure 1) is richly-endowed with a range of deposit types (e.g., Ahmad et al., 2013; Geological Survey of Queensland, 2011). These include the basin-hosted base metal (Zn-Pb-Ag) deposits of the North Australian Zinc Belt, the richest zinc province in the world (Geological Survey of Queensland, 2011; Huston et al., 2006), as well as Cu (e.g., Mt Isa Copper) and IOCG (e.g., Ernest Henry) deposits (Geological Survey of Queensland, 2011). The giant size of the base metal deposits makes them attractive exploration targets and significant effort has been undertaken in understanding their genesis and setting and developing methodologies and data sets to aid in further discovery. As part of its Exploring for the Future program, Geoscience Australia is acquiring new, and reprocessing old, data sets to provide industry with new exploration tools for these basin-hosted Zn-Pb and Cu deposits, as well as iron-oxide copper-gold deposits. We have adopted a mineral systems approach (e.g., Huston et al., 2016) focussing on regional aspects such as source rocks, locations of mineral deposits, mineralisation haloes and footprints. Increased understanding of these aspects requires knowledge of the background variability of unaltered rocks within the basin. To assist in this we have undertaken a campaign of baseline geochemical studies, with over 800 new samples collected from sedimentary and igneous units of selected parts of the greater McArthur Basin–Mount Isa region. This has allowed us to document temporal and regional background geochemical (and mineralogical) variation within, and between sedimentary and igneous units. The main focus of this work was directed towards aspects of base metal mineralisation; a concurrent GA study (e.g., Jarrett et al., 2019) looking at aspects of hydrocarbon potential was undertaken in parallel. Appeared in Annual Geoscience Exploration Seminar (AGES) Proceedings, Alice Springs, Northern Territory 24-25 March 2020, p. 105